Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] photograph will be admissible so long as the discrepancies between it and its subject are not materially misleading either because they are minor or because the witness explains them ‘in such a way that the jury would not be misled.’ ”
• “[A] photograph will be admissible so long as the discrepancies between it and its subject are not materially misleading either because they are minor or because the witness explains them ‘in such a way that the jury would not be misled.’”
• “This exclusion of 'verbal acts’ from the hearsay rule obviously extends to a written contract offered in court not for the truth of any facts stated in it but to prove the existence of a contractual right or duty.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).