Skip to main content
· 7/1/2005

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Delaware River Port Authority

Citations

  • 880 A.2d 628
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 247
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the proponent must demonstrate a good faith effort to procure the declarant’s attendance at trial
  • holding no exception; proponent did not take any steps to procure witness's appearance and relied solely on membership in a witness protection program as proof of unavailability
  • holding plaintiff’s reliance solely on witness’ membership in witness protection program and failure to take any steps to procure witness’s appearance did not establish witness was unavailable under Rule 804

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Hudock, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.