Skip to main content
· 12/16/1987

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Briggs & Turivas, Inc.

Citations

  • 678 F. Supp. 1298
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13598
  • 1987 WL 40542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s mention of the “potential inconvenience” of retrial during re-instruction to a jury, known to be deadlocked, was prejudicial error, even though the judge did not mention the expense of another trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holschuh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.