Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. McNeill

Citations

• 60 Fla. 38

Syllabus

<p>1. In an action to recover for services rendered from August to December it is not error upon the question of the application of payments to admit evidence that there was a continuing service beginning in April.</p> <p>2. On an issue as to whether a contract for the sale of lands was made and possession was taken and labor was done on the lands for the purchasers in pursuance of- the contract, testimony as to what the alleged purchaser said he believed he could do in paying for the lands may be stricken as -being irrelevant.</p> <p>3. Where the action is not on a letter it is not error to admit the letter tending to show employment, though not a joint one, if otherwise relevant, on the ground that it is addressed to two persons and only one of them brings the action.</p> <p>4. Where there is evidence to sustain the verdict and no error appears, the judgment will not be reversed on writ of error.</p>