· 5/6/1974
Consolidated Kinetics Corp. v. Marshall, Neil & Pauley, Inc.
Citations
- 521 P.2d 1209
- 11 Wash. App. 173
- 182 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 434
- 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding issue of obviousness in case arising under state contract law
- “[S]tate court has jurisdiction to consider the issue of patent validity as a defense to the action [to recover patent royalties].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.