Skip to main content
· 8/14/1992

Consolidated International Automotive, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 797 F. Supp. 1007
  • 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 692
  • 16 C.I.T. 692
  • 14 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1797
  • 1992 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Commerce was substantially justified in addressing matters regarding economy of PRC which “were not settled or fixed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.