Skip to main content
· 12/11/1981

Consolidated Freightways v. National Labor Relations Board, Charles Hennessey, Intervenor

Citations

  • 669 F.2d 790
  • 215 U.S. App. D.C. 404
  • 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2370
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring only that the objection be “evident by the context in which it is raised”
  • “[A] party who has limited his objections before the Board to one issue will not be allowed to raise a different issue on appeal.”
  • \Cases interpreting section 10(e) look to whether a party's exceptions are sufficiently specific to apprise the Board that an issue might be pursued on appeal.\
  • \[T]he critical inquiry is whether the objections made before the Board were adequate to put the Board on notice that the issue might be pursued on appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Wilkey, Wald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.