· 12/11/1981
Consolidated Freightways v. National Labor Relations Board, Charles Hennessey, Intervenor
Citations
- 669 F.2d 790
- 215 U.S. App. D.C. 404
- 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2370
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring only that the objection be “evident by the context in which it is raised”
- “[A] party who has limited his objections before the Board to one issue will not be allowed to raise a different issue on appeal.”
- \Cases interpreting section 10(e) look to whether a party's exceptions are sufficiently specific to apprise the Board that an issue might be pursued on appeal.\
- \[T]he critical inquiry is whether the objections made before the Board were adequate to put the Board on notice that the issue might be pursued on appeal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bazelon, Wilkey, Wald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.