Consolidated Doors, Inc. v. Mid-America Door Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining “to adopt a novel interpretation” of Rule 60(b) in ruling on the party’s “motions for reconsideration” under subsections (2) and (3)
• denying Rule 11 sanctions because, among other things, a “mini- trial” would be required to decide disputed issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).