Skip to main content
· 5/19/1904

Consolidated Dental Mfg. Co. v. Holliday

Citations

  • 131 F. 384
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4910

Syllabus

<p>t. Contracts — Ambiguity—Parol Evidence.</p> <p>Where written contracts were not only ambiguous in respect to wbat was stated therein, but also in respect to matters omitted, and were incomplete as to vital matters necessary to render them working contracts, it was proper to admit parol evidence to show bow the contracts had been construed by the parties for a period of seven years during which they carried on. business.</p> <p>¶ 1. See Evidence, vol. 20, Cent. Dig. § 2129.</p>

Judges: Pardee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.