Skip to main content
· 5/3/1920

Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Egich

Citations

  • 22 Ariz. 543
  • 199 P. 132
  • 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that speculative evidence concerning the necessity of the alley to the town’s growth did not require denial of petition to vacate in light of the Town’s longstanding lack of use of the alley

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Cunningham, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.