Massachusetts Appeals Court· 6/24/1981
Consiglio v. Carey
Citations
- 421 N.E.2d 1257
- 12 Mass. App. Ct. 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that window air conditioning units that could be removed without damage to themselves and without material damage to the premises constituted personal property
- “The question whether similar items were annexed, and therefore realty, or unannexed and therefore personalty, has generally been held to be one of fact”
- removal of chattel permitted where removal “causes no material injury to the estate, and where the thing can be removed without losing its essential character or value as a personal chattel”
- upon expiration of lease, outgoing tenant who removes trade fixtures which he installed during the course of the lease “has an obligation to restore the premises to the condition they were in before the tenancy”
- walk-in freezer determined to be removable fixture
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hale, Cutter, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- North Pacific Processors, Inc. v. City & Borough of YakutatAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-06-29· cited 23×
- Interior Energy Corp. v. Alaska StatebankAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-04-14· cited 8×
- Southern Massachusetts Broadcasters, Inc. v. DuchaineMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-10-27· cited 8×
- Chapman v. KatzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-03-16· cited 6×
- Worcester Redevelopment Authority v. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-08-04· cited 6×
- Cummings Properties Management, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 1992-03-19· cited 4×
- Harris v. Old King's Highway Regional Historic District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. BundzaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-02-28· cited 2×
- Chapman v. KatzMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-29· cited 2×
- Gipson v. Fleet Mortgage Group, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 2002-11-07· cited 1×
- George M. Zolotas & Bros. v. SantosMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1987-02-19· cited 1×
- Touher v. Town of EssexMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2015-08-10
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Keeney v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1939-11-28· cited 44×
- McConnell v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1877-06-30· cited 32×
- Guthrie v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-10-15· cited 29×
- Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-11-26· cited 27×
- Bay State York Co. v. Marvix, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1954-05-19· cited 16×
- Noyes v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1917-01-11· cited 16×
- Hanrahan v. O'ReillyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1869-09-15· cited 15×
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-12-19· cited 11×
- Smith v. Bay State Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-06-22· cited 10×
- Greene v. LampertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-01-29· cited 9×
- Walker Dishwasher Corp. v. Medford Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-03-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.