Skip to main content
· 4/30/1894

Conshohocken Tube Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 161 Pa. 391
  • 28 A. 1119
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 704

Syllabus

<p>Corporation — Suit on coupons — Execution—Evidence—Buie of court.</p> <p>Where an action is brought upon coupons it is not necessary to prove the execution of the mortgage securing the bonds to which the coupons were attached, particularly where a rule of court providing for an affidavit denying the execution of a writing sued upon has not been complied with.</p> <p>Recovery may be had upon coupons signed by the vice president of the company, although the mortgage accompanying the bond provided that the bonds should be signed by the president.</p>

Judges: Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.