Conservation Law Foundation v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Notwithstanding these differences, the jury verdicts in these cases 15 amply demonstrate the potential for large punitive damage awards in employment discrimination 16 cases.”
• rejecting Defendants’ claim that “by August 2003, they will seek to implement a forthcoming Amendment 13, which will purportedly comply with the [Act]” where framework adjustment then in place was insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).