Consejo De Titulares Condominio Francia v. Sucesion Hortensia Luisa Pierluisi Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court should dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of valid waiver and no miscarriage of justice would result
• holding that argument made under Booker fell within scope of appeal waiver
• holding that claim that district court failed to impose supervised release conditions reasonably related to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) factors did not allege “illegal” sentence outside scope of appeal waiver
• explaining that the dismissal of “an allegation that the sentencing judge misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines or abused his or her discretion” does not constitute a miscarriage of justice
• noting that the misearriage-of-justice exception to appeal waivers includes the right to appeal illegal sentences
• noting that where “a plea agreement is ambiguous, the ambiguities are construed against the government” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).