Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Wilder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Conseco could seek court remedies for enforcement of its security interest in a mobile home without rendering the arbitration clause unenforceable
• holding that substance of arbitration clause is not unconscionable because terms not unreasonable or oppressive
• confirming, pursuant to KRS 417.220(l)(a), this Court retains jurisdiction to review an appeal from an otherwise interlocutory order denying a motion to compel arbitration
• stating the greater protections statutorily provided for secured transactions that protect both parties and streamline the litigation procedures
• stating plaintiffs “have advanced no reason to conclude that arbitration is inherently incompatible with the [Kentucky Consumer Protection Act’s] purposes”
• stating the greater protections statutorily provided for secured transactions that protect both parties and streamline the litigation procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).