Skip to main content
· 11/15/1872

Consalus v. Brotherson

Citations

  • 54 How. Pr. 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • There was a jury issue regarding whether an automobile salesman was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of a collision where there was evidence that he used a company demonstration car to take acquaintances who might be potential customers to a social event.
  • There was a jury issue regarding whether an automobile salesman was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of a collision where there was evidence that he used a company demonstration car to take acquaintances who might be potential customers to a social event.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.