Conroy Datsun Ltd. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U. S. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant was unduly prejudiced where the plaintiffs filed their motion to amend “ten days before the close of discovery” and the motion, “if allowed, would require additional and duplicative discovery on an entirely new area of inquiry”
• distinguishing Kavanaugh because dealer fully able to assert claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).