Conrad v. Universal Fire & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that if premium “refund had been transmitted to the [insureds], it presumably would have put them on notice of cancellation”
• holding that “mailing” clause in an insurance policy envisioned the use of ordinary mail, but not certified mail, which requires a signature, and that certified mail is therefore not reasonably calculated to reach the insured and is not effective as a “mailing device”
• proof of mailing, by certified mail or by ordinary mail, creates a presumption of delivery, but the presumption of delivery may be rebutted where a certified letter is returned undelivered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).