Skip to main content

Conrad v. State

Citations

  • 938 N.E.2d 852
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2383
  • 2010 WL 5135345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 71A03-1611-CR-2720 | July 27, 2017 Page 14 of 21 in light of the requirements of Evidence Rule 412(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Najam, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.