Conrad v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warrant describing “ ‘[m]ethamphetamine, other drugs/controlled substances, and other items indicative of the sale/ distribution of controlled substances/dangerous drugs which are being possessed in violation of Georgia Law’ ” sufficient
• warrant sufficiently particular where it described items to be seized as “ ‘[mjethampethamine, other drugs/controlled substances, and other items indicative of the sale/distribution of controlled substances/dangerous drugs which are being possessed in violation of Georgia Law’ ”
• search warrants which fail to satisfy the particularity requirement are invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fair v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-07-14· cited 82×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-31· cited 21×
• Strickland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-11-20· cited 9×
• Burruss v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-02-03· cited 7×
• Lockhart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-21· cited 7×
• Usher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-17· cited 6×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-08-15· cited 5×
• State v. Dills
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-19· cited 4×
• Watson Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-02-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• State v. Stephens
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-02-06· cited 206×
• Boatwright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-10-10· cited 17×
• Thomason v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-11-10· cited 8×
• Minter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-10-14· cited 8×