Skip to main content
· 4/17/2006

Conrad v. Sewell

Citations

  • 926 So. 2d 515
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 1225
  • 2006 WL 1139372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that trial court may afford a plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to cite in necessary parties, and upon a plaintiff's failure to do so, court could have stricken complaint for nonjoinder of necessary parties
  • declining to affirm trial court’s decision to strike complaint on ground of nonjoinder of necessary party, when such ground was not raised by defendant in motion to strike
  • in ruling on a motion to strike the trial court is limited to considering the grounds specified in the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.