Skip to main content
· 11/10/2009

Conrad v. Phone Directories Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 585 F.3d 1376
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1638
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24727
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,726
  • 2009 WL 3739389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a final decision “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment” (citation omitted)
  • “We also take into account the broader context of the statute as a whole when ascertaining the meaning of a particular provision.”
  • “We also take into account the broader context of the statute as a whole when ascertaining the meaning of a particular provision.”
  • “We also take into account the broader context of the statute as a whole when ascertaining the meaning of a particular provision.”
  • “[T]he court must look beyond the caption to the essential attributes of the motion itself.”
  • “[The court] may consult a dictionary to determine the plain meaning of a term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Ebel, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.