Skip to main content
· 5/7/2024

Conrad Massey v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under Federal Rule of Evidence 701 that the jury benefitted from a police officer’s shoeprint-comparison testimony because the officer had “more time to study and compare the evidence” than the jury had
  • finding that mentally retarded suspect validly waived Miranda rights since his “cooperativeness and coherency * * * demonstrate that he grasped both the nature of the charges against him and the consequences that could flow from his interactions with police”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.