· 11/15/1876
Conover v. Stringer
Citations
- 53 Ind. 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members
- holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members
- holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Downey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.