Skip to main content
· 11/15/1876

Conover v. Stringer

Citations

  • 53 Ind. 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members
  • holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members
  • holding that a Union was entitled to equitable protection in the use of label or mark designating product of labor of the members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.