· 4/15/1868
Conover v. Mers
Citations
- 6 F. Cas. 322
- 3 Fish. Pat. Cas. 386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to allow appellant to benefit from gamesmanship to preclude testimony of key prosecution witness
- where appellant waived confrontation rights, Court applied constitutional reliability standard in determining whether residual hearsay rule was met
- declarant “was still suffering under the trauma of the event when she made her statements”
- accused may not withhold “trump card” and play it on appeal if he loses at trial
- absence of suggestive questioning, knowledge “not within the ken” of child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.