Skip to main content
· 4/15/1868

Conover v. Mers

Citations

  • 6 F. Cas. 322
  • 3 Fish. Pat. Cas. 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to allow appellant to benefit from gamesmanship to preclude testimony of key prosecution witness
  • where appellant waived confrontation rights, Court applied constitutional reliability standard in determining whether residual hearsay rule was met
  • declarant “was still suffering under the trauma of the event when she made her statements”
  • accused may not withhold “trump card” and play it on appeal if he loses at trial
  • absence of suggestive questioning, knowledge “not within the ken” of child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.