Conover v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding courts consider the relationship between the parties, reasonable foreseeability of harm to the person injured, and public policy factors in deciding whether a duty is owed
• holding courts consider the relationship between the parties, reasonable foreseeability of harm to the person injured, and public policy factors in deciding whether a duty is owed
• instructing that whether a legal duty “exists is a question of law.”
• reasonable foreseeability of harm to person who is injured is a factor in deciding whether a legal duty exists
• reasonable foreseeability of harm to person who is injured is a factor in deciding whether a legal duty exists
• reasonable foreseeability of harm to person who is injured is a factor in deciding whether a legal duty exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).