Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that professional malpractice claims are choses in action arising out of tort and are therefore not assignable prior to judgment under New Jersey law
• finding that professional malpractice claims are choses in action arising out of tort and are therefore not assignable prior to judgment under New Jersey law
• applying prohibition against assignment of tort claims to a professional malpractice claim
• applying prohibition against assignment of tort claims to a professional malpractice claim
• as a matter of New Jersey public policy, tort claims could not be assigned; parties, therefore, could not create rights of assignability of tort claims in New Jersey, the state where cause of action arose, by entering into contract for such assignment in another state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 81×
• Long v. City of Glendale
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-06-29· cited 48×
• Rotech Healthcare Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-07-24· cited 31×
• Docteroff v. Barra Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-06-21· cited 27×
• Higgins v. Lauritzen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-07· cited 17×
• Van Hoove v. Mid-America Building Maintenance, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1993-12-15· cited 16×
• R.J. Longo Construction Co. v. Transit America, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1996-04-10· cited 13×
• Athey v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2015-08-31· cited 9×
• Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1996-03-11· cited 8×
• Quality Guaranteed Roofing, Inc. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-06-25· cited 8×
• Stichting Ter Behartiging Van de Belangen Van Oudaandeelhouders In Het Kapitaal Van Saybolt International B.V. v. Schreiber
  Second Circuit· 2005-05-03· cited 5×
• Sofia Design & Development at South Brunswick, LLC v. D'Amore (In re D'Amore)
  D. New Jersey· 2012-05-31· cited 5×
• Stichting Ter Behartiging Van De Belangen Van Oudaandeelhouders In Het Kapitaal Van Saybolt International B.V. v. Philippe S.E. Schreiber
  Second Circuit· 2005-05-03· cited 4×
• Stanton v. RICH BAKER BERMAN & CO., PA
  D. New Jersey· 1995-01-30· cited 4×
• New Falls Corp. v. Lerner
  D. Connecticut· 2008-09-26· cited 4×
• Akrosil Division of International Paper Co. v. Ritrama Duramark, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1994-02-16· cited 3×
• Meadox Medicals, Inc. v. Life Systems, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1998-05-11· cited 3×
• Lane Construction Corp. v. Trading Merchandising Co.
  Stafford County Circuit Court· 1994-09-14· cited 2×
• Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadie (John T.)
  Third Circuit· 1994-10-12· cited 1×
• COMERICA BANK & TRUST, N.A., personal representative, & another v. BROWN & ROSEN, LLC, & another.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-08-30· cited 1×