Skip to main content
· 8/2/1996

Conoco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vesta Energy Company, Intervenors

Citations

  • 90 F.3d 536
  • 319 U.S. App. D.C. 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing producers to challenge a pipeline’s spin-off of an affiliated gathering company
  • allowing producers to challenge a pipeline’s spin-off of an affiliated gathering company
  • “[W]e conclude that the Commission did not adequately explain its jurisdiction to condition approval of the spin-down of gathering facilities on a default contract mechanism . . . .”
  • “[W]e conclude that the Commission did not adequately explain its jurisdiction to condition approval of the spin-down of gathering facilities on a default contract mechanism . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Sentelle, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.