Connors v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in dicta, that when the Burlington‐Carter factors are met, the IDEA permits district courts to order prospective funding for a unilateral placement in appropriate circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frank G. And Dianne G., Parents of a Disabled Student, Anthony G. v. Board of Education of Hyde Park, Central School District, Docket No. 04-4981-Cv
  Second Circuit· 2006-07-27· cited 213×
• E.M. v. New York City Department of Education
  Second Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 85×
• S.W. v. New York City Department of Education
  S.D. New York· 2009-03-30· cited 24×
• Sabatini v. Corning-Painted Post Area School District
  W.D. New York· 2001-09-26· cited 21×
• Pearl Murphy, Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education, No. 03-7850-Cv
  Second Circuit· 2005-03-29· cited 16×
• Sabatini v. Corning-Painted Post Area School District
  W.D. New York· 1999-12-29· cited 12×
• Noyes v. Grossmont Union High School District
  S.D. California· 2004-06-29· cited 8×
• Vultaggio Ex Rel. Vultaggio v. Board of Education
  E.D. New York· 2002-08-14· cited 6×
• L.M. ex rel. H.M. v. Evesham Township Board of Education
  D. New Jersey· 2003-03-31· cited 6×
• F.R. v. Board of Education
  E.D. New York· 1999-10-07· cited 5×
• Lamoine School Committee v. MS Z. Ex Rel. N.S.
  D. Maine· 2005-01-04· cited 4×
• Z.H. ex rel. Z.H. v. New York City Department of Education
  S.D. New York· 2015-05-28· cited 1×
• LM Ex Rel. HM v. Evesham Tp. Bd. of Educ.
  D. New Jersey· 2003-03-31