Connors v. Marontha Coal Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 29 U.S.C. § 1392(e) can be read to allow a right of action against persons not otherwise falling within the definition of employer
• reaching the same conclusion on very similar facts: The allegedly fraudulent conveyances took place in Kentucky and were alleged to be a violation of Kentucky law; the pension fund was being administered in the District of Columbia.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).