Skip to main content
· 1/15/1992

Connors v. Incoal Inc.

Citations

  • 781 F. Supp. 50
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 301
  • 1992 WL 5957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a foot/ankle sprain is not a disability because it did not substantially limit a major life activity
  • finding that plaintiff's impairment was objectively minor because, at the summary judgment stage, there was overwhelming evidence in the record that the plaintiff could perform all duties in her job description, despite her impairment of a sprained ankle/foot
  • “Plaintiff describes her condition with so few details that the court cannot infer whether the activity limited by plaintiff’s impairment is a major life activity or whether plaintiff’s impairment substantially limits a major life activity.”
  • ankle/foot sprain is not a disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.