Skip to main content
· 4/2/2007

Connor v. Countrywide Bank NA (In Re Connor)

Citations

  • 366 B.R. 133
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2509
  • 2007 WL 974342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disclaimer-free billing statements do not violate the automatic stay if sent to a debtor who intends to ride through
  • finding that in a case converted from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7, pre-conversion loan statements did not violate the stay, while post-conversion loan statements might because post-conversion, debtor had no interest in knowing amount due
  • explaining that the statement and payment coupon sent in Draper violated the automatic stay because the debtor did not need the information contained therein and payments to the secured mortgage creditor were already being made pursuant to a confirmed plan
  • monthly statements sent by mortgage company did not violate stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert J. Faris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.