· 11/19/2004
Connie Thurman John Thurman v. Daimlerchrysler, Inc., James Stanford Pittman, Jointly and Severally
Citations
- 397 F.3d 352
- 116 F. App'x 638
- 116 Fed. Appx. 638
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24306
- 2004 WL 3167706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing district court’s dismissal of state-law claims after dismissing FMLA claim in favor of remand
- upholding dismissal of Title VII claims as barred by reasonable six-month contractual limitations period
- “[T]here is nothing inherently unreasonable about a six-month limitations period contained in an employment agreement.” (citation omitted)
- “I agree that any claim or lawsuit relating to my service with Chrysler Corporation or any of its subsidiaries must be filed no more than six (6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Rogers, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.