Connie F. Cunningham v. Joseph Scibana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “BOP[] program statement is an internal agency guideline that has not been subjected to the rigors of notice and comment rulemaking” and therefore is not entitled to Chevron deference
• “Although the two terms are quite similar, we must assume that Congress made a deliberate choice to use different language.”
• “The use of different terms within related statutes generally implies that different meanings were intended.” (quoting 2A Norman J. Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 46.06, at 194 (6th ed.2000))
• \The use of different terms within related statutes generally implies that differ- ent meanings were intended.\ (quoting 2A Norman J. Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 46.06, at 194 (6th ed. 2000))
• \The use of different terms within related statutes gener- ally implies that different meanings were intended.\ (quoting 2A Nor- man J. Singer, Sutherland’s Statutes and Statutory Construction § 46.06, at 194 (6th ed. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).