Connie Ehrlich v. Moss Creek Solar, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the candidates asserting competitor standing had to “anticipate” defending against potentially illegal campaign tactics
• noting that directly regulated parties do not have automatic standing absent showing of imminent injury
• vacating agency rules at Chevron step one because the agency’s “narrow interpretation of” a statutory term was “implausible.”
• vacating agency rules at Chevron step one because the and-capricious style review, interpreting a statute is quite a different enterprise than policy-making” (internal quotation marks and ellipsis omitted)
• declining to assess a claim about the meaning of a statutory provision where the failure of the challenged action under the arbitrary and capricious standard offered a sufficient basis for decision
• “[T]he FEC lacks discretion to exclude [communications intended to influence federal elections] from its coordinated communication rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).