Skip to main content
· 8/30/2001

Connie D. Gray v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 263 F.3d 595
  • 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 450
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19270
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,955
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1172
  • 2001 WL 987330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing an alleged weakness in the plaintiffs prima fa-cie case following a jury trial
  • addressing an alleged weakness in the plaintiff’s prima facie case following a jury trial
  • noting, in connection with the third method, that \whether the plaintiff has in fact presented evidence supporting each element of her prima facie case is material to the determination whether she has demonstrated that the employer's articulated reason.... is not credible.\
  • noting, in connection with the third method, that “whether the plaintiff has in fact presented evidence supporting each element of her prima facie case is material to the determination whether she has demonstrated that the employer’s articulated reason .... is not credible.”
  • noting, in connection with the third method, that “whether the plaintiff has in fact presented evidence supporting each element of her prima facie case is material to the determination whether she has demonstrated that the employer’s articulated reason .... is not credible.”
  • comparables are substantially similar if they dealt with the same supervisor, were subject to the same standards, and engaged in the same conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Boggs, Batchelder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.