Conner v. Lavaca Hospital District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there could be no reasonable reliance on a contract following its repudiation
• holding that there could be no reasonable reliance on original contract following its repudiation
• holding that there could be no reasonable reliance on original contract following its repudiation
• stating, “Generally, duration, compensation, and the employee’s duties are essential elements of an employment contract”
• “Any services provided after . . . repudiation cannot reasonably be said to have been in reliance on the [repudiated contract].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).