Connelly v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel could not be found ineffective in the absence of any proffer of testimony to contradict expert’s testimony that defendant was competent to stand trial
• counsel could not be found ineffective in the absence of any proffer of testimony to contradict expert's testimony that defendant was competent to stand trial
• under the evidence proffered at the hearing on defendant’s motion for new trial, it was “impossible to conclude” that any additional evidence “would have changed the outcome of his trial”
• under the evidence proffered at the hearing on defendant’s motion for new trial, it was “impossible to conclude” that any additional evidence “would have changed the outcome of his trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).