Connelly v. Steel Valley School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court's grant of motion to dismiss because assumptions underlying school actions were \reasonable\
• affirming district court's dismissal of equal protection claim because assumptions underlying challenged policy were reasonable
• reviewing Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Privileges or Immunities claims “under the same standard”
• identifying “race, religion, [and] alienage” as “inherently suspect distinctions” (quoting Schumacher v. Nix, 965 F.2d 1262, 1266 (3d Cir. 1992) (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. DeJesus, 347 F.3d 500, 510–11 (3d Cir. 2003) (Fuentes, J.
• reciting standard of review for a district court's denial of leave to amend
• \We begin by considering which equal protection standard governs our review. . . . \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).