Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error cannot be plain where current law is unsettled
• reconciling verdicts because “jury’s efforts to apply the instructions were understandable and had some basis in the evidence”
• “The New Hampshire Supreme Court has consistently declined to adopt the rule or consider the “significant relationship” test only as to contract claims. Id. (citing Glowski v. Allstate Ins. Co., 134 N.H. 196, 198 (1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).