Connell v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that section 8(a) is flexible and does not limit rehabilitation to formal training
• finding improper assessment of penalties after date on which claimant became aware that doctor had released him to perform work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amoco Oil Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-16· cited 18×
• Mobil Oil Corp. v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-02-01· cited 12×
• Nascote Industries v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-01· cited 7×
• Roper Contracting v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-16· cited 7×
• Daniels v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-19· cited 3×
• American Insulated Structures v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-02-01· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Board of Education of City of Chicago v. Industrial Com.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 54×
• McKay Plating Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 46×
• Brinkmann v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 37×
• National Tea Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 24×
• Continental Distributing Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-21· cited 23×
• Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 6×