Skip to main content
· 8/16/2000

Connell v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York

Citations

  • 109 F. Supp. 2d 202
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11727
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1541
  • 2000 WL 1170900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiff's evidence of age discrimination \thin\ when, in part, the decision-makers were also in the protected age category
  • ultimate issue is not whether defendant “over-reacted” to Plaintiff’s misconduct, but whether plaintiff was dismissed for discriminatory reasons
  • “Because the same people who approved an incentive award for plaintiff only the year before made the decision to discharge him, this factor also suggests that discrimination was not a cause of his layoff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.