· 8/16/2000
Connell v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
Citations
- 109 F. Supp. 2d 202
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11727
- 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1541
- 2000 WL 1170900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff's evidence of age discrimination \thin\ when, in part, the decision-makers were also in the protected age category
- ultimate issue is not whether defendant “over-reacted” to Plaintiff’s misconduct, but whether plaintiff was dismissed for discriminatory reasons
- “Because the same people who approved an incentive award for plaintiff only the year before made the decision to discharge him, this factor also suggests that discrimination was not a cause of his layoff.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.