Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
D. Connecticut· 9/27/2006

Connecticut v. Spellings

Citations

  • 453 F. Supp. 2d 459
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69552
  • 2006 WL 2789871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that statute’s administrative review scheme “reflect[e]d an intent to preclude the type of pre-enforcement action brought by the state” under Thunder Basin even though final agency decisions “could be reviewed by a district court under the APA”
  • requiring that a plaintiff challenging NCLB exhaust administrative remedies first
  • requiring that a plaintiff challenging NCLB exhaust administrative remedies first
  • requiring that a plaintiff challenging NCLB exhaust administrative remedies first
  • “In return for federal educational funds under the Act, Congress imposed on states a comprehensive regime of educational assessments and accountability measures.”
  • “In return for federal educational funds under the Act, Congress imposed on states a comprehensive regime of educational assessments and accountability measures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Connecticut v. Spellings

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.