Connecticut Ry. & Lighting Co. v. Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a previous version of the Statement was an interpretive statement of position and not subject to rulemaking requirements
• holding that a revised version of PS 5162.02 was an interpretive statement of position and not subject to rulemaking requirements
• noting that “Congress entrusted the decision whether to grant inmates early release…solely to the discretion and expertise of the BOP”
• holding Bureau’s definition of crime of violence was permissible
• “While the Bureau of Prisons’ definition of a crime of violence” in Program Statement 5162.027 “may not be consistent with court interpretations of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).