Skip to main content
· 8/31/1994

Connecticut National Bank v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 638 N.E.2d 942
  • 37 Mass. App. Ct. 231
  • 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that § 3(d) of the long-arm statute, dealing with tortious acts outside the Commonwealth, “is predicated on general jurisdiction.”
  • explaining that in order for Massachusetts to have personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the Commonwealth such that the assertion of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
  • § 3[d] “is predicated on general jurisdiction,” i.e., defendant having engaged in continuous and systematic activity in forum, unrelated to suit
  • defendant, Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in Georgia, made over thirty shipments of lumber to Massachusetts with an aggregate value of more than $375,000
  • defendant transacted business under §3(a) where it made over 30 shipments of product to Massachusetts, a substantial volume of business that was purposeful solicitation of business rather than isolated transaction
  • jurisdiction proper where plaintiff was not a party to the transaction causing the suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Dreben, Gillerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.