Connecticut Investment Co. v. Yokom

Citations

• 105 Wash. 428
• 178 P. 628
• 1919 Wash. LEXIS 989

Syllabus

<p>Appeal (322-1)—Recobd—Absteacts. A motion to strike is not the proper remedy to correct a defective abstract.</p> <p>Same (322-1). Where an abstract of the record fails to comply with Rule VI, giving the form and requiring the testimony to be set out in “chronological order,” the appellant will be required, on motion, to prepare and file an abstract in conformity to the rule; and it is immaterial that the form used is claimed to conduce to clearness.</p>