Connecticut Indemnity Company v. Der Travel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that coverage was precluded under policy with similar exclusion when complaint alleged only intentional conduct
• stating “it is the actual complaint, not some hypothetical version, that must be considered”
• “an insurer has no duty to defend where it is ‘clear from the face of the underlying complaint that the allegations fail to state facts which bring the case ... potentially within the policy’s coverage’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).