Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Hotel Associates of Tucson (In Re Hotel Associates of Tucson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the fact that a debtor could leave a class unimpaired does not change the class’s status from impaired to unimpaired; it is not the bankruptcy court’s role to determine whether alternative payment structures could produce a different result regarding impairment
• remanding to bankruptcy court for findings on whether plan proposed in good faith
• A bankruptcy court need not determine the exis- tenee of alternate payment structures, and a plan proponent is not required to create unimpaired classes.
• “Under Bankruptcy Code [§] 1129(a)(10), a plan cannot be confirmed unless at least one ‘impaired class’ accepts the plan, excluding acceptance by any insider.”
• “[A] a plan cannot be confirmed unless at least one ‘impaired class’ accepts the plan, excluding acceptance by any insider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).