Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs 'action was “brought solely to clarify their obligations as insurers” where the “underlying controversies ... [were the] defendants’ contractual claim's to benefits” under insurance policies
• “the term ‘enforce’ does not encompass an action to determine the propriety of a denial of benefits”
• “An action to clarify one’s obligations as an insurer is not a suit to ‘enforce’ the terms of an ERISA plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).