Skip to main content
· 9/7/2010

Connecticut Bar Ass'n v. United States

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 81
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18894
  • 2010 WL 3465650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are generally deemed waived.”
  • “Issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are generally deemed waived.”
  • “Issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are generally deemed waived.”
  • \Allegations of a 'subjective chill' are generally 'not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm.'\ (quoting Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1, 13-14 (1972))
  • describing Zauderer as applying “rational basis review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Raggi, Gleeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.